'The Enemy Within'

Scooped by Richard Moore:

 

Unidentified Air Force Intelligence Officer Re: Sept. 11, 2001

 

Q. Are you saying that there was cooperation and collaboration between elements of our  government and the perpetrators?
A. No. What I'm saying is that these groups (within the federal government - TV) were the  perpetrators of the action, right down the line from top to bottom.

Robert Sterling
Editor, The Konformist (http://www.konformist.com)
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/2001/wtcenemywithin15sep01.shtml

Sept. 13, 2001

TOP_VIEW has just conducted a brief yet immeasurably important phone interview -- set up by a trusted and totally reliable intermediary already known to us -- with an Air Force Reserve intelligence specialist.  The interview was carried out this evening, over two days after the incredible death and devastation that took place in New York City and Washington D.C. Our Air Force source told us his superiors had activated him at about 10 AM Tuesday morning.

He absolutely refused to permit us to record the conversation, even though he was speaking into some kind of electronic gizmo that substantially altered the sound of his voice; making him sound like Darth Vader with a serious chest cold.

Some portions of his statements were unintelligible, and he refused to repeat several of these.

Although this source was somewhat taciturn and close-lipped, for the most part he was cooperative in terms of giving us enough time to transcribe what he was saying. Overall what is stated plainly and unequivocally is of absolutely  paramount importance for every single person in this nation and the world: certainly among those of us who value our inalienable human rights and liberties and want them to remain un-imperiled, un-abrogated and unabridged.

(Transcriped telephone interview with an Air Force Reserve Intelligence specialist concerning the events of Sept. 11, 2001)

          TOP_VIEW: We'd like to hear what you have to say about the events on Tuesday. First of all, I assume
          you have knowledge of the events that goes above and beyond what the public is being told by the media
          and the government?

          Intel source: That's quite correct.

          TOP_VIEW: Can you -- are you able and willing to relay this information to us?

          Intel source: Well, that depends. Some of it. You're going to publish this?

          TOP_VIEW: On the Internet.

          Intel source: It's essential that nothing which could possibly be used to identify myself or "**" (our
          intermediary) is made public.

          TOP_VIEW: We totally understand. Completely. That's exactly how it will be, and --

          Intel source: You've known "**" a long time?

          TOP_VIEW: For about 6 years, sir.

          Intel source: So... he'll vouch for you? (Chuckles) Fire away.

          TOP_VIEW: Well... it's becoming increasingly clear that certain federal government sectors had prior
          knowledge of the destruction carried out on Tuesday. Would you concur with this?

          Intel source: (unintelligible)

          TOP_VIEW: Excuse me? I didn't understand you.

          Intel source: Never mind.

          TOP_VIEW: Is it true that our government knew what was going to happen?

          Intel source: You could say that. Actually there are certain (pause) groups in our government who pretty
          much ran the whole show.

          TOP_VIEW: Are you saying that there was cooperation and collaboration between elements of our
          government and the perpetrators?

          Intel source: No. What I'm saying is that these groups (within the federal government - TV) were the
          perpetrators of the action, right down the line from top to bottom.

          TOP_VIEW: This is really incredibly shocking, what you're saying here. Did I understand correctly, that
          you say elements of the federal government were the prime force behind these so-called terrorist attacks
          Tuesday?

          Intel source: That's correct. Absolutely.

          TOP_VIEW: God, what a horrifying thing to come to grips with! What is your feeling about this sir, and
          exactly why are you even talking to us about this? Are you positive about what you're saying?

          Intel source: (laughs) What should I answer first? I would never make this kind of statement without being
          fully certain it was factual. My own feeling is that it's completely sickening. It's repugnant and unacceptable
          and I'm completely opposed to what was done. But it's true and we all have to deal with it. There are
          forces within our government who are completely determined to change the structure of our society at the
          most basic level, and these are the kind of things they're going to be doing to make sure that (fundamental
          changes in our society) happens.

          TOP_VIEW: What's going on in the military right now with regard to what's occurred? Do many military
          higher-ups know this, and if so what's their position?

          Intel source: (unintelligible)

          TOP_VIEW: Excuse me?

          Intel source: I said some do know and some don't. Some wouldn't believe it, just like many citizens
          wouldn't believe it. There are certainly lots of conflict going on at the upper levels of the military right now
          between people aware of the true facts.

          TOP_VIEW: What about yourself?

          Intel source: I consider myself to be a patriotic American who believes strongly in the Constitution. I'll do
          whatever is in my power to uphold and defend those principles, and so will many others.

          TOP_VIEW: Well that's something I wanted to get to. The primary motivation for an atrocity of this
          magnitude would seem to be to soften up the country for some serious curtailment of civil liberties, in the
          name of protecting us from such "terrorist" attacks. I've likened it to Hitler's burning of the Reichstag in
          Germany.

          Intel source: That's a good comparison. (Unintelligible)... one of the main reasons the action was carried
          out Tuesday. There's also other agendas having to do with control of the Middle East oil fields, and things
          related to that (issue).

          TOP_VIEW: Well, are people such as yourself in any way prepared to, or able to, oppose these forces?

          Intel source: Speaking for myself, I'd say there's a lot I'm prepared to do and will do. Speaking to you is
          one of those things. And there are many more like me.

          TOP_VIEW: Now, how does the attack on the Pentagon figure into this whole thing?

          Intel source: I can't discuss that at all.

          TOP_VIEW: Can you some time in the future?

          Intel source: Maybe. I think I'll need to sign off here soon.

          TOP_VIEW: Is there anything else in particular you'd care to say, any advice or whatever?

          Intel source: I'd say that our way of life is facing the biggest threat in our history, and the enemy is very
          much within. VERY MUCH WITHIN.

          TOP_VIEW: So it boils down to: what happened on Tuesday was an inside job?

          Intel source: Absolutely. All the way down the line and to a much higher level than most of you could ever
          imagine. There's a very intense struggle going on within our government like I said.

          TOP_VIEW: It's a struggle we're all involved in, sir.

          Intel source: That's quite true.

          TOP_VIEW: It seems very clear to me that the Bush administration was way involved in the attacks.
          Would that be correct? They obviously want to bring about the exact kind of fundamental social
          restructuring that you mentioned.

          Intel source: It's a good bet. Right now, it's best we cut this short.

          TOP_VIEW: Good night and thank you very much for speaking with us.

          This concluded our short but vastly significant interview with a patriotic Air Force intelligence officer.

          Folks, we've heard it from the proverbial horse's mouth. Americans are in the most critical struggle in our
          entire history, and the enemy is a deceptive, malevolent and indeed demonic force deeply ensconced within
          the very fabric and structure of our federal government, and which also infests even our news and
          information sources, our entertainment, our schools and workplaces and many other aspects of our life and
          our society.

          As our source stated: "the enemy is very much within."

http://educate-yourself.org/cn/2001/wtcenemywithin15sep01.shtml

'Ex-Italian President: Intel Agencies Know 9/11 An Inside Job'

"...2/8/80 Bologna Station bomb

"The makings of the bomb which killed 85 people at Bologna railway station
in 1980 came from an arsenal used by Gladio, the Italian wing of Nato's
communist-resistance network, according to a parliamentary commission on
terrorism...The suggested Link with the Bologna massacre is potentially the
most serious of all the accusations levelled against Gladio, and comes just
two days after the Italian Prime Minister, Guilio Andreotti, cleared
Gladio's name in a speech to parliament, saying that the secret army did
not drift from its formal Nato military brief." (Ed Vulliamy, Guardian,
16/1/91)..."

http://users.westnet.gr/~cgian/gladio.htm

 

 

"...As headmaster of Propaganda Due, Gelli allegedly assumed a major role in Gladio's "strategy of tension" in Italy, starting with the 1969 Piazza Fontana bombing. Gladio was a clandestine "stay-behind" operation sponsored by the CIA and NATO to counter communist influence in Western European countries, which has been involved in terrorist false flags operations in Italy.^[5][6][7][8]

In 1990, a report on RAI Television alleged that the CIA had paid Licio Gelli to foment terrorist activities in Italy ^[9]. Following this report, which also claimed that the CIA had been involved in the assassination of the Swedish Prime minister Olaf Palme, then President Francesco Cossiga requested the opening of investigations, while the CIA itself officially denied these allegations ^[10] Critics have dismissed the RAI report as a fraud because of the inclusion of testimonies from controversial Richard Brenneke, who had claimed to be a former CIA agent and made several declarations concerning the October surprise conspiracy. Brenneke's background was also investigated by a U.S. Senate subcommittee, which dismissed Brenneke's claims of CIA employment.^[11]

The Gladio affair has been treated by the courts as having no sensible connection with the P2 affair...."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Licio_Gelli

 

Man who set up Operation Gladio tells Italy's largest newspaper attacks were run by CIA, Mossad

 

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
4 Dec 2007

Former Italian President and the man who revealed the existence of Operation Gladio Francesco Cossiga has gone public on 9/11, telling Italy's most respected newspaper that the attacks were run by the CIA and Mossad and that this was common knowledge amongst global intelligence agencies.

Cossiga was elected President of the Italian Senate in July 1983 before winning a landslide 1985 election to become President of the country in 1985.

Cossiga gained respect from opposition parties as one of a rare breed - an honest politician - and led the country for seven years until April 1992.

Cossiga's tendency to be outspoken upset the Italian political establishment and he was forced to resign after revealing the existence of, and his part in setting up, Operation Gladio - a rogue intelligence network under NATO auspices that carried out bombings across Europe in the 60's, 70's and 80's.

Gladio's specialty was to carry out what they coined "false flag operations," terror attacks that were blamed on their domestic and geopolitical opposition.

Cossiga's revelations contributed to an Italian parliamentary investigation of Gladio in 2000, during which evidence was unearthed that the attacks were being overseen by the U.S. intelligence apparatus.

In March 2001, Gladio agent Vincenzo Vinciguerra stated, in sworn testimony, "You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple: to force ... the public to turn to the state to ask for greater security."

Cossiga's new revelations appeared last week in Italy's oldest and most widely read newspaper, Corriere della Sera. Below appears a rough translation.

"[Bin Laden supposedly confessed] to the Qaeda September [attack] to the two towers in New York [claiming to be] the author of the attack of the 11, while all the [intelligence services] of America and Europe ... now know well that the disastrous attack has been planned and realized from the CIA American and the Mossad with the aid of the Zionist world in order to put under accusation the Arabic Countries and in order to induce the western powers to take part ... in Iraq [and] Afghanistan."

Cossiga first expressed his doubts about 9/11 in 2001, and is quoted in Webster Tarpley's book as stating that "The mastermind of the attack must have been a “sophisticated mind, provided with ample means not only to recruit fanatic kamikazes, but also highly specialized personnel. I add one thing: it could not be accomplished without infiltrations in the radar and flight security personnel.”

Coming from a widely respected former head of state, Cossiga's assertion that the 9/11 attacks were an inside job and that this is common knowledge amongst global intelligence agencies is highly unlikely to be mentioned by any establishment media outlets, because like the hundreds of other sober ex-government, military, air force professionals, allied to hundreds more professors and intellectuals - he can't be sidelined as a crackpot conspiracy theorist.

~ Link ~

Oliver Stone seeks to film 'Ahmedinejad's Adventures'

from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy
Volume 2007, Issue No. 118
5 Dec 2007

Secrecy News Blog:  http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/

 

OLIVER STONE SEEKS TO FILM "AHMADINEJAD'S ADVENTURES"

Filmmaker Oliver Stone is expected to visit Tehran in the near future
to negotiate arrangements for a film about Iranian President Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad, the Iranian press reported last week.

"We have announced that he has asked for permission to travel to Iran
for direct negotiations and to plan the project," one official told the
Tehran Times.

Stone first sought Iranian permission last summer to make the film,
variously referred to as "Ahmadijenad's Adventures" or "The Truth About
Ahmadinejad."  His initial request was denied, but was then reconsidered
and approved by the President himself "if certain conditions were met."

Among such conditions, the Tehran Times reported, "Stone would not be
allowed to invent any scenarios. [Instead,] he should only use
incidents from the president's real life in the film."

See "Oliver Stone may visit Tehran for Ahmadinejad biopic: Sajjadpur,"
Tehran Times, November 30:

     http://www.tehrantimes.com/index_View.asp?code=158249

News about the proposed film project "has amazed and worried many
friends of Islamic Iran's honour and power and those concerned about
its reputation," according to one Iranian commentator.

"How can one trust a person... who, despite efforts at proclaiming
himself to represent the opposition in America's ruling system, is in
line and in accordance with the essence and the overall policies of
this system," wrote Elham Rajabpur in the conservative Tehran daily
Keyhan.

The writer objected to several of Stone's films including Alexander ("a
hated figure among Iranians") and The Doors (about "one of America's
perverted and half-mad singers").

"We are afraid that the outcome of [Stone's Iranian film] venture will
not be the true and realistic portrayal of an intellectual and a
peacemaker such as Ahmadinejad, but a portrayal of Ahmadinejad
according to Stone, Hollywood, and global Zionism."

See "Oliver Stone's Presence in Iran: Opportunity or Threat" by Elham
Rajabpur, Keyhan, December 3 (translated by the DNI Open Source
Center):

     http://www.fas.org/irp/news/2007/12/stone.html

'The Power of Community: How Cuba Survived Peak Oil'

"When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1990, Cuba's economy went into a tailspin. With imports of oil cut by more than half – and food by 80 percent – people were desperate. This film tells of the hardships and struggles as well as the community and creativity of the Cuban people during this difficult time. Cubans share how they transitioned from a highly mechanized, industrial agricultural system to one using organic methods of farming and local, urban gardens. It is an unusual look into the Cuban culture during this economic crisis, which they call "The Special Period." The film opens with a short history of Peak Oil, a term for the time in our history when world oil production will reach its all-time peak and begin to decline forever. Cuba, the only country that has faced such a crisis – the massive reduction of fossil fuels – is an example of options and hope.

 

The Power of Community: How Cuba Survived Peak Oil is a project of The Community Solution, a non-profit organization that designs and teaches low-energy solutions to the current unsustainable, fossil fuel based, industrialized, and centralized way of living. Visit www.communitysolution.org for more information."

 

http://www.powerofcommunity.org/cm/index.php

More than half of Amazon will be lost by 2030, report warns

" ... Climate change could speed up the large-scale destruction of the Amazon
rainforest and bring the "point of no return" much closer than previously
thought, conservationists warned today.

Almost 60% of the region's forests could be wiped out or severely damaged
by 2030, as a result of climate change and deforestation, according to a
report published today by WWF.

The damage could release somewhere between 55.5bn-96.9bn tons of carbon
dioxide into the atmosphere from the Amazon's forests and speed up global
warming, according to the report, Amazon's Vicious Cycles: Drought and
Fire.

Trends in agriculture and livestock expansion, fire, drought and logging
could severely damage 55% of the Amazon rainforest by 2030, the report
says. And, in turn, climate change could speed up the process of
destruction by reducing rainfall by as much as 10% by 2030, damaging an
extra 4% of the forests during that time. ... "

 

~ Read on... ~

 

social lending

" ... Pouring your cash into the far reaches of the world wide web may sound like a crazy idea.

 

After all, the internet has seen its fair share of nasties from phishing e-mails posing as a bank to key logging software pinching our passwords and personal information, all in an effort to steal our identity and cash.

But now there is a wave of sites trying to convince people that the web is the place for their money.

The concept is called social lending and the idea is to introduce people who need money to people who want to lend some - cutting out the middlemen like banks and mortgage companies. ... "

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/click_online/6623267.stm

Bob Black: The Abolition of Work and other essays

Part I: The Abolition of Work

"Abolition" originated as a speech at the Gorilla Grotto in San Francisco,
an "adult play environment," in February 1981. Proprietor Gary Warne, who
later became a policeman, has denounced the event as the worst spectacle he's
ever staged, and he must have meant it since he later had his goons beat me
up. Intrigued by the posters of the Last International, Warne challenged me
to "put your foot where your mouth is." I put it somewhere else. The
exclusion of a noisy group of punks who, at my instigation, tried to get in
without paying was only one of the evening's diversions.
Five years later I revised and greatly expanded the spiel into the following
essay, while retaining, I think, much of its feel as a speech. It has pride
of place because I still think, as many of the other texts assert in
particular contexts, that work as the most fundamental negation of freedom
is an institution that must be addressed, and overcome, by anyone pretending
to have an interest in liberty. Anyone who ignores or evades the issue of
work itself may well be a "libertarian" (or for that matter a Marxist) but
he is no libertarian.

Introduction by Ed Lawrence

The Abolition of Work (1996 Revision)

Suggested Readings

Rants and Essays by Bob Black

source: http://www.inspiracy.com/black/

'RAN Stumps Toyota: Why Not?'

From the Rainforest Action Network blog:

" ... after a great day of cloak and dagger infiltration at the LA Auto Show. Here’s what the AP had to say about incident in this video:

After the Sequoia was introduced Wednesday, an environmental activist with a video camera approached Toyota’s general manager for U.S. sales, Bob Carter, and asked why the company won’t withdraw from a lawsuit against California, which has sued the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to establish tougher fuel economy rules.

Carter refused to answer and knocked the camera out of Brent Olson’s hands. Olson, of San Francisco-based Rainforest Action Network, was eventually led away by two policemen. ... "

~ Link ~